Laura King 0000-00-00 00:00:00
Ontario chiefs push for modified dispatch Six minutes. That’s the span between cardiac arrest and the start of irreversible brain death. Firefighters and paramedics know this. But given the complicated dispatch systems and the tiered and varied response protocols for fire and EMS across Canada, it’s clear that many politicians, administrators and taxpayers don’t understand it. The Ontario Association of Fire Chiefs is trying to change that. At its annual conference in May, Fire Chief Shayne Mintz, chair of the OAFC Pre-Hospital Care Committee, spoke clearly and passionately about the flaws in – and politics of – Ontario’s Central Ambulance Communication Centres (CACCs – pronounced “kacks”) dispatch system and the need for a new protocol that embraces the superior response capabilities of the fire service. The OAFC’s pre-hospital care committee has spent more than two years researching fire and EMS response times and the benefits of a combined service. Now, despite some anticipated opposition from EMS, the OAFC is lobbying the provincial government for a more cohesive fire/EMS system, following the lead of jurisdictions such as Winnipeg, Lethbridge, Alta., and Seattle, Wash. “The mission of Ontario’s fire services is to protect and save lives and property,” says OAFC president and Oakville Fire Chief Richard Boyes. “There are no conflicting agendas.” Indeed, increased use of the Winnipeg fire service for EMS calls has cut response time in half to 4.5 minutes and is expected to save 10,000 ambulance calls in one year and $8.5 million. In Lethbridge, which has had integrated fire/EMS since 1912, all firefighters are trained paramedics who may ride an ambulance one day and a pumper the next. “Irreversible brain death starts six minutes after circulation stops,” Mintz told the Ontario chiefs convention. “We have a system that can help avert that.” The gist of the problem in Ontario is that many fire departments are not being dispatched by the CACCs or they’re being dispatched significantly later than EMS. (The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care operates 11 CACCs; five others are operated by hospitals and there are four local ambulance communications services in the province.) In a video on the merits of a fire/EMS response system shown to OAFC delegates, proponents of a strengthened fire/EMS system noted that: Firefighters cross trained as EMTs and paramedics can deliver similar care as paramedics; • Firefighters can and have received 1,200 to 1,800 hours of training to become paramedics; • Firefighters will always be the front line; • Firefighters can perform in ways that are patient centred and that single-role paramedics can’t – they can handle an entire incident from an extrication to an elevator rescue because they have different equipment, skill sets and authorities than paramedics. Lethbridge firefighter/paramedic Dana Terry outlines his city’s program on the video“What we see is the built-in efficiency of joint disciplines who are able to come as one and treat the patients. What it comes down to is patient treatment. It provides an efficiency for the city…” In the U.S. the International Association of Fire Fighters and the International Association of Fire Chiefs are embracing combined fire/EMS system and a national lobby group, Fire Service- Based EMS Advocates, is raising awareness of the benefits of fire-based EMS. In Ontario, Boyes, Mintz and others have made it clear that the OAFC supports EMS ambulance services and paramedics but they note that some EMS budgets in Ontario have increased considerably over the last few years yet two-thirds of EMS services still fail to meet prescribed response times. “It’s not about the EMS people, they’re doing a great job,” Mintz said during the OAFC presentation. “It’s about the lack of us [firefighters] being made aware when we can provide patient centred, lifesaving help to those in urgent need.” “The EMS skills and abilities are all there – we’re not trying to take over EMS here. This is about citizen and patient centred services that, with timely notification from the ambulance dispatch centres will get the quickest response to citizens in need.” Fire departments in many Ontario communities were approached in 1995 (or earlier) by the health-care community to come help with emergency assistance; that’s when defibrillators were put on fire trucks. “Lives are needlessly at risk,” says Mintz. “The current approachIs not working. There are people collapsing in the streets needing urgent care.” Mintz said he’s received letters from people thanking the fire service for arriving quickly to emergency medical calls. One was from a paramedic noting that the fire response time was excellent and crucial to a patient who had collapsed while shovelling snow. “That’s because in most cases we can get there in six minutes or less, so that’s where we need to be stepping forward and saying, ‘Hey, call us’. No one wants to see their mother or father collapsing at the end of the driveway and needlessly waiting for help because there’s a policy that says the EMS shows up first.” Mintz says politicians and taxpayers should consider the fire service a health-care partner given that its members have been doing CPR and defibrillation for more than a decade. The fact is that fire trucks and firefighters trained in life saving and strategically located in municipalities for rapid responses can get to accident scenes or medical calls faster than paramedics and ambulances, the OAFC says. A November 2008 discussion paper on pre-hospital care by the OAFC and the Ontario Professional Fire Fighters Association, called Saving Lives in 6.0 Minutes or Less by Utilizing the Efficiencies of the Ontario Fire Service, points out the 2005 Ontario auditor general’s findings that says ambulance response times average 13. 1 minutes for life-threatening emergencies and notes that standalone EMS providers seem to be having difficulty bettering these times. “Ontario’s fire services have the ability to respond effectively and quickly to all hazards; fires, motor vehicle accidents, hazmat/chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) incidents, terrorists attacks and yes, with existing medical skills, life threatening medical calls such as cardiac arrest,” the discussion paper says. “In many cases, patients only require immediate life saving treatment, but they may also require physical rescue, protection from the elements and protection in the way of scene safety. The fire service is structured to address all of the above simultaneously and is perfectly positioned to complement and enhance a strugglingEMS delivery system across Ontario, thus significantly improving patient outcomes.” Getting back to those six crucial minutes after cardiac arrest: obviously, the sooner the patient receives CPR and/or defibrillation, the greater the probability of survival. According to the OAFC, the average response time for the fire service, as reported by the Ontario Fire Marshal, is six minutes. That means the average response time in many urban areas is less than six minutes. That’s less than half of the average 13.1-minute response time for EMS in Ontario. The chance of successful resuscitation is reduced by between seven per cent and 10 per cent for each minute of delay in intervention. “Dispatching fire and EMS simultaneously would better ensure that Ontarians receive prompt and trained emergency medical response when they need it most,” the association says. Indeed, the OPFFA and the OAFC say they have heard many accounts of ambulances with lights and sirens speeding past a fire hall several minutes before the fire department received a call from the ambulance dispatch centre to respond to the same incident. Hence, the OAFC argument: “Failure to call the community fire department simultaneously, despite existing agreements to do so, compromises the public well being and severely hampers the fire service’s ability to provide rapid and effective emergency response. While not only being a frustrating situation for both the public and for firefighters this could also have a significant impact on patient outcome.” Indeed, Ontario’s 2005 auditor general’s report noted that two-thirds of ambulance operators were not meeting legislated response times yet the cost of the service increased by 94 per cent over four years. More funding was provided between 2005 and 2007 with no change to overall ambulance response times. “This clearly demonstrates the current model isn’t effective, and that the current approach to fixing it isn’t working either,” the OAFC says. “We must look at other alternatives within our existing resources to create a truly patient centred system. The best way to reduce response times is to better utilize the fire departments.” Phase II of the Ontario Pre-hospital Advanced Life Support Study (OPALS) as sponsored by the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care showed that municipalities can more than double its cardiac arrest survival rate, for little cost, if a defibrillator unit can be on scene within five minutes of the call 90 per cent of the time. “Full-time fire departments in Ontario typically can meet this response target,” the OAFC says in its March 2009 update to its 2008 discussion paper. “The breakdown typically occurs in dispatch. When fire and ambulance are not dispatched at the same time there is a delay between the first emergency call for help and fire’s response. As a result, patient survivability suffers. The fire service is not being used to its fullest potential in critical emergency medical situations. “Fire trucks already respond to medical calls, so there are no additional costs. We are only highlighting the merits of sending them sooner.” The OAFC has been working closely with the Ontario Professional Fire Fighters Association on this issue with Mark McKinnon, chair of the OPFFA’s EMS committee co-presenting the discussion papers with Chief Mintz. “It’s not about EMS services and what they’re doing and fire services and what we’re doing,” he told the OAFC conference. “It’s about making sure the best, fastest service delivery gets to the public.”
Published by Annex Firefighter. View All Articles.
This page can be found at http://magazine.firefightingincanada.com/article/Simultaneous+Response/175505/18395/article.html.